Select FIVE sets of quotes and explain the significance of each one in relation to the nature of storytelling, belief and what makes the “better story”.
All of these quotes come from Chapter 99 in Life of Pi, immediately after Pi tells his story to the investigators.
Page 292:
Mr. Okamoto: “Mr. Patel, we don’t believe your story.”
“Sorry – these cookies are good, but they tend to crumble. I’m amazed. Why not?”
Page 294:
“Carnivorous trees? A fish-eating algae that produces fresh water? Tree-dwelling aquatic rodents? These things don’t exist.”
“Only because you’re never seen them.”
“That’s right. We believe what we see.”
“So did Columbus. What do you do when you’re in the dark?
“Your island is botanically impossible.”
“Said the fly just before landing in the Venus flytrap.”
“Why has no one else come upon it?”
“It’s a big ocean crossed by busy ships. I went slowly, observing much.”
Page 296:
“We have difficulty believing it.”
“It’s an incredible story.”
“Precisely.”
Page 297:
“The arrogance of big-city folk! You grant your metropolises all the animals of Eden, but you deny my hamlet the merest Bengal tiger! “
“Mr. Patel, please calm down.”
“If you stumble at mere believability, what are you living for? Isn’t love hard to believe?”
“Mr. Patel–“
“Don’t bully me with your politeness! Love is hard to believe, ask any lover. Life is hard to believe, ask any scientist. God is hard to believe, ask any believer. What is your problem with hard to believe?
“We’re just being reasonable.”
“So am I! I applied my reason at every moment. Reason is excellent for getting food, clothing and shelter. Reason is the very best tool kit. Nothing beats reason for keeping tigers away. But be excessively reasonable and you risk throwing out the universe with the bathwater.”
Page 299:
“Tigers exist, lifeboats exist, oceans exist. Because the three have never come together in your narrow, limited experience, you refuse to believe they might.”
Page 301-302:
“So you didn’t like my story?”
“No, we liked it very much…We will remember it for a long, long time.”
…
“So you want another story?”
“Uh…no. We would like to know what really happened.”
“Doesn’t the telling of something always become a story?…Isn’t telling about something – using words, English or Japanese – already something of an invention? Isn’t just looking upon this work already something of an invention?…The World isn’t just the way it is, it is how we understand it, no? And in understanding something, we bring something to it, no? Does that make life a story?”
Page 302-303:
“I know what you want. You want a story that won’t surprise you. That will confirm what you already know. That won’t make you see higher of further or differently. You want a flat story. An immobile story. You want dry, yeastless factuality”
…
“You want a story without animals.”
Page 311:
“He was such an evil man. Worse still, he met evil in me – selfishness, anger, ruthlessness. I must live with that.”
…
“What a horrible story.”
Page 317:
“You can’t prove which story is true and which is not. You must take my word for it.”
“I guess so.”
“In both stories the ship sinks, my entire family dies, and I suffer.”
“Yes, that’s true.”
“So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer? Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals?”
Mr. Okamoto: “That’s an interesting question…”
Mr. Chiba: “The story with animals.”
Mr Okamoto: “Yes. The story with animals is the better story.”
Pi Patel: “Thank you. And so it goes with God.”
When you finish the chapter, answer the following questions:
Question 1:
What point in Martel making about stories and storytelling in this chapter?
Question 2:
Pi’s objections and arguments are based on logic and reason. When, then, do readers tend to identify with the investigators in this chapter?
Question 3:
After reading this chapter, do you feel that you have been ‘tricked’ by the novel? Does this chapter contain the ‘truth’? What is the ‘truth’ that lies behind this story?
